Table 93

Directions (1-5): Study the following table carefully and answer the questions given below it: 

Number of candidates from different locations appeared and passed in a competitive examination over the years

YearRuralSemi urbanState capitalsMetropolitan
App.Pass.App.Pass.App.Pass.App.Pass.
20012153932813924687164324896956328
2002491516589784401585293628125186038
200316522089432352811725452695383214
2004562823927894251350541468101584018
200518393179969426382583159112475158
2006503217988562293390154311136246419

Note: App. → Appeared,  Pass. → Passed

Q1. In 2005, what was the average number of failed candidates from all locations ? 
(a) 4436
(b) 4894
(c) 4256
(d) 4604
(e) None of these
Q2. What percentage of candidates passed from semi-urban location in all the 6 years ? 
(a) 41.94
(b) 36.67
(c) 39.39
(d) 33.67
(e) 38.24
Q3. The total number of failed candidates in 2004, 2005 and 2006 from state-capital location is what percent more/less than failed candidates in 2001, 2002 and 2003 from Rural location ? 
(a) 126.09% more
(b) 93.07% more
(c) 23.01% less
(d) 112.35% more
(e) 22.32% more
Q4. In which year, percentage of failed candidates was least from metropolitan location ? 
(a) 2004
(b) 2006
(c) 2001
(d) 2005
(e) 2002
Q5. What is approximate ratio of passed candidates in 2003 from rural location to the percentage of passed candidates in 2006 from state-capital location ? 
(a) 53 : 173
(b) 131 : 237
(c) 59 : 157
(d) 61 : 39
(e) 63 : 239

Answer & Explanation

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *